Wow. The US government, and dare I say Israel, got their a**es handed to them regarding their believability of evidence for convicting charity organization Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development of terrorism (technically, providing material support to foreign terrorist organizations, aka Hamas). No decision on the consipracy charges, no decisions on whether they helped terrorist organizations, etc.
The government argued that the money collected by Holy Land went to other charities which then went to Hamas, which they provided no evidence for, just saying that the money benefitted Hamas. Since 1995, it's been illegal for US organizations to provide money to Hamas. Israeli agents provided via pseudonyms evidence that these other organizations gave their money to Hamas, but not Holy Land. What a strange tactic.
I can't imagine why our government would drop the ball on this case at all. For them, the implications are disasterous - they/we look like we're secret-evidence toting, brown-person targetting, remorseless Muslimhating, double-standard charity platers. It's sad and rediculous. Break out the mouse suits, let the schadenfreude from the left begin.
Brown people jumping on themselves? Check
Babies holding sad signs? Check
To be fair and balanced:
Disaffected, unhappy "fact" reporting? Check
Pictures of Hamas? Check
For what it's worth, Holy Land Foundation Charities is the big fish the government's been trying to spear, knocking off suckerfish over the years:
- Oct 2006 - Georgia Imam Shorbagi pled guilty to funding Hamas (via Holy Land Foundations) (nyt)
- Feb 2007 - Salah & Ashqar acquitted of helping Hamas, where Holy Land was claimed as a defendant (nyt)
Fun quote #1: “The government has tried to turn the Israeli-Palestinian conflict into
something criminal,” said William Moffitt, who is Dr. Ashqar’s lawyer.
“Maybe the government will get it in their heads that the conflict
won’t be settled in the criminal courts of the United States.”
Fun quote #2: The lone guilty finding against Salah related to a written response in
which he denied being a Hamas member that was made in a civil suit won
by the family of David Boim, a 17-year-old American killed in Israel in
1996. Piers [defense attorney] said he expected the $156 million judgment in that case to
be overturned on appeal. [The parents accused Salah and Ashqar of conspiring to kill their son via donations to Hamas] The trial saw an unprecedented appearance by agents of Israel's Shin
Bet intelligence service, who testified in disguise to a cleared
courtroom. They reportedly said Salah was not tortured.
Hillarity #3: [Riotous shill, Judith] Miller testified that she saw no evidence of mistreatment when she
witnessed an interrogation of Salah and -- in an unprecedented twist
for a U.S. courtroom -- two Israeli interrogators testified under
aliases that Salah was treated well. (
wapo)
What's really interesting is the level of desire to point to Hamas as the issue. Places that are known for good research, like the
9/11 Finding Answers foundation, put the Ikhwan/Muslim Brotherhood and their ties to Hamas down (properly) as a source of violence, but to whom and in what context? In our governments specific fight against "funding sources of terrorist organizations," they've fallen down here, blowing legit chances at unraveling knots by refusing to show how threads are connected, regardless of the clear connections in that region. But here? Our own ties with Israel make our funding pursuit look more and more like a pro-Israel "witchhunt" rather than an exposure of how violent NGOs continue to get funded.
Apple dropped it's price on DRM-free MP3's to $0.99 (some DRM tracks are $0.89, see
ArsTechnica, WSJ) via
iTunes Plus, just like all their other tracks; and Amazon (from $0.89 and up) and WalMart ($0.94/ea) are starting to offer DRM-free MP3 downloads - what is this world coming to!
http://icanhaz.com/mp3z?
Never mind that Apple
embeds your name in their DRM-free tracks - they're 256 kbps instead of the normal +DRM 128 kbps iTunes tracks.
Amazon's are 256 vbr, fyi.
Sweet. My iPod Touch crashed while browsing the csis site yesterday and I barely knew it - I thought it just dropped me back to the main app launcher screen because I mistapped or accidentally did some combination. But, no, it actually crashed.
How did I know? Next time I hooked kitterpod up to synch, iTunes asked (something like), "Hey, there, I see you've had a crash, would you like to report it to Apple?" I clicked "totally" before I could get a screenshot, but Apple keeps all the crashlogs on the local computer:
The crash file contains an Incident Identifier - seems obvious, to track the incident, a CrashReporter Key - which merits more digging, since it looks like a SHA-1 hash or maybe an actual encryption key? (lunixnerts) - bytes free, bytes wired, the app that's about to jettison and a ps list. Woot! OS X, for one, and the crashy app is called MobileSafari. Who knows where else MobileSafari might be deployed?
Incident Identifier: 2F067E21-C4EF-42FA-B970-D3CB90754080
CrashReporter Key: [redacted]
OS Version: OS X 1.1.1 (3A110a)
Date: 2007-10-10 21:59:34 -0600
1449984 bytes free
34918400 bytes wired
About to jettison: MobileSafari
Processes
PID RPRVT RSHRD RSIZE Command
1 148K 220K 236K launchd
13 344K 176K 536K CommCenter
15 6.44M 13.5M 8.31M SpringBoard
16 664K 208K 836K configd
17 192K 176K 352K crashreporterd
18 1.54M 272K 2.07M iapd
19 296K 292K 524K mDNSResponder
20 404K 356K 676K lockdownd
21 188K 224K 272K syslogd
22 84.0K 180K 112K update
23 292K 264K 484K ptpd
26 188K 208K 252K notifyd
419 840K 784K 1.31M mediaserverd
430 11.4M 13.0M 19.3M MobileSafari
434 312K 320K 896K crashdump
**End**
Dropping one back to the main screen seems like a fairly decent way of handling a crash or a bug on this platform. Not knowing immediately that I'd crashed, I went back to Safari, sorry MobileSafari, and it restarted with the same pages I had in place - at the time, csis, a csis pdf, and JiveTalk beta for iPhone - all of which reloaded. And crashed. But eventually, kept going.

Safari on the iPod Touch doesn't do SVG. What you're not seeing there is the polygon layer north west of Manaus, Amazonia, Brazil.
I wonder how much memory (and processor stress) the svg code would've been.

The iPod Touch's Safari browser shows Arabic characters as blocks.
I guess they couldn't afford the extra memory for the additional fonts for Safari "lite."
A
Unicode sample page highlights the other character sets left off of the "Safari-light" that's on the iPhone and Touch - Devangari (Hindi) and varietals (Tamil, Bengali, Gujrati), Arabic, Tibetan, Tagalog, Thai, and Hebrew, among others.

I've updated the
wwc wwj project on JavaForge with the latest NASA wwj source, in
trunk\worldwind.release and have added tags for previous releases (
05/11, original;
08/17, latest; and
09/15). Don't ask me why the
latest download of wwj points to 08/18/2007 or the
sourceforge version is still 05/11/2007, but they are.