Which is stupider the Biden-Brownback Iraqi partition bill
or the Leiberman-Kyl blind rage run-up to a war on Iran bill?
All the throngs of readers of this prolific blog will
recognize, I find it the height of hubris for our domestic pandering Neanderthals,
Congress, to start pretending they’re aware of or anything north of Minnesota or
south of Galveston Island. For these
people, the rest of the world is one big photo op and list topper for the last
few years, the prize paparazzi joint, has been the horrifically dangerous Iraq,
the one place these people can’t get into fast enough so they can decry how
quickly our troops should be getting out.
Add to this the almost universal and unexplainable zeitgeist
of hatred spewing out towards Iran this week coupled with the handjobbery and
backpattery from all sides, from the president of Columbia University, to Fred
Thompson, Newt Gingrich and Socialist radio personalities on Air America, all
falling over to up the count of how many times they can say “evil” and “Ahmedinejad”
with the same breath.
Literally everyone is trying to point the finger at someone
else, preferably someone of the brownish persuasion, about who’s to blame for
Iraq – it’s either the Iraqis themselves or their neighbors who are causing our
boys and our country to fail – not in any way us. Introspecting or discussing what’s within our
power to change is liable to be branded either “planning to fail” or not
wanting to succeed. Try getting a radio
talk show host to define what “success” looks like in Iraq without rehashing
Bush’s vague “stable democracy that supports America.”
With General Petraus stating that Iran is waging a proxy war
against us, it’s opened the door for a bipartisan photo op of unprecedented damage,
garnering 73 votes in the Senate for the Leiberman-Kyl bill that states we
should go ahead with a covert war against Iran.
Let’s not bother questioning whether this is a consequence of short term
policy decisions on either side or whether there’s any implications beyond this
week’s Iran hating press cycle. First
off, we should acknowledge that Iraq’s a mess of corruption and multiple
attitudes towards all insurgents of all stripes and that there are any number
of organizations that would fund combatants and supply arms to those
combatants, from Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, Israel, yes, Iran, and geez,
guess who, us (ref. all the dead Anbar leaders). It’s myopic and retarded to think that Iraq’s
neighbors aren’t going to try to influence Iraq in a multitude of ways and,
eventually, one of those ways will blow up or fly at supersonic speeds and kill
one of our boys. Second, if
intentionally killing one of our soldiers were a cause for war, we would’ve
attacked Israel long, long ago.
With the popular outrage of the progress of the war in Iraq
and the general apathy and ignorance towards the Middle East in this country,
the desire for having our troops get out of Iraq is growing. One of the more
stupid ideas has been peddled by Senator Biden for a few years now and it’s a “weak
federal government, strong ethno-regional state government, and equal oil
distribution” plan. In the historical
categories of occupation, it falls somewhere in the annals of colonial strategies,
something like divide-and-conquer but with a twist of ostrich – run away and
hide your head from the consequences. It’s
clear that the heyday of colonialism is long past, yet Biden thinks it’s World
War 1 again, where the west has the power to divide a country via our perception,
like a modern day Sykes-Picot agreement of 1916, of their ethnic
differences – whee, he figured out that there are 3 (never mind all the others)
types of brown people! – and then expect things to work out. It’s also clear, historically, that if you
want to do divide-and-conquer you have to have enforcement, like the British
did during the Raj (twist your Google Earth centered on Baghdad a few
longitudes to the left) with their governors and strict rule enforcement. Also never mind that we’ve already done our
version of it, with the Coalition Provisional Authority and L. Paul
Bremer. It takes a lot of gall to
suggest a colonial model – something we as Americans have always shunned – and then
follow it up with “it’ll all just work out.”
I can’t imagine anything stupider than our domestics
thinking their beltway ideas have any effect beyond our borders.
http://dilbertblog.typepad.com/the_dilbert_blog/2007/09/a-feeling-im-be.htmlThanks to
Jared for pointing this to me.
I'd say the same thing, except it'd come out "angry" instead of Scott Adams' "parody."
Two quick things:
- Yesterday, jury selection started in the Florida Liberty City Seven "cell," the Seas of David (Orlando Sentinel) who were caught "plotting" to blow up Chicago's Sears Tower (none of them had ever been to Chicago) - jury selection's expected to last 3 months. It should be interesting to see what comes out of this trial - the details of the FBI agent(s) posing as Al Qaeda, the details of the martial-arts organization and their connections with the Moorish Science Temple, and how the public regards another terror trial.
- We all know that after 9/11 other countries have been using the word "terrorist" willy-nilly to crack down on their unruly groups, but Israel's gone one better labeling the whole Gaza Strip as an "enemy entity" (Reuters) bringing in a pseudolegal justification of their apartheid. One wonders why they need to play rhetorical games when they've done so well without it?