Welcome to blog.chinoy.com Sign in | Join

Friday, June 03, 2005 - Posts

Amnesty International's kicks one in their own goal. Melana Zyla Vickers article Shamnesty International is exactly right about how western institutions are played like a fiddle by Al Qaeda.

My only regret here is that I didn't come up with that title myself, upon first hearing about the report.
0 Comments
Europa - Constitution In the aftermath of the "Non/Nein" and Heard Round the World, it seems like there's some passive agressive rage going on with regards to the adoption of the Euro. There's been a call for the return of the Dutch Guilder and the Italian Lira as well as some pouting by Luxembourg, current holders of the rotating EU presidency (it changes every 6 months).

Both the Dutch and the Italians are ticked about the Euro-induced inflation they've had to endure since the switch to a single currency.

"Wouldn’t it be better perhaps to return, temporarily, at least to a system of double circulation (of both the euro and lira)?" - Roberto Maroni, Italian Welfare Minister (Times Online)

The Germans, who're huge EU supporters and have approved the failed EU Constitution, gave this retort: 'Going back to the deutschmark is not an option,' German finance ministry spokeswoman said. (Forbes)

Frits Bolkestein, former EU single market commissioner, told Dutch television last week that he now regretted giving up the guilder, the symbol of Dutch trading success. (Telegraph)

Jean-Claude Juncker, the Luxembourg prime minister, said he'd resign if his country votes no on their EU Constitution referrendum, July 10th (Telegraph) - "As a result of the referendums, the euro is weakened. What helps the economy for the moment could in the long term become a burden," he said. "It is a question of basic decency towards the voters of Luxembourg. If there is a ’no’, it is not the people who have to quit. It is up to me to go." (Times Online)

0 Comments
This particular suicide bombing in Iraq merits a bit of analysis - Suicide bomber kills 10 at Sufi Muslim gathering, Reuters. Does it matter whom the Islamists blow up?

Many people get that there're two large sects in Islam, the Sunnis and the Shi'i, and that the Shi'i are the majority in Iraq (and, post-war, in power) and in Iran. There are other sects and one of the largest outside the main two is Sufism, the mystical variant of Islam which emphasizes the spiritual connection with God and has adherents from both Shi'a and Sunni.

The Wahhabi Islamist movement that's been sparked by al Qaeda believes that all non-Wahhabi Sunni sects of Islam are blaspehmers and must be hunted down and destroyed. In Iraq, their current political motive is to rile up an internal Islamic religious civil war, pitting the strict Sunni interpretation of Islam versus all others and in particular, the Shi'i, who're in power in the new Iraqi government. In Pakistan, the sectarian strife that the Islamists are causing is a direct reflection of the country's political situation, where Musharraf has the unpleasant job of trying to balance appearing strong and kowtowing to the overwhelming pro-Islamist / retroactive Sunni majority.

This Iraqi suicide bombing and the suicide bombing of a Sufi gathering in Pakistan last Friday could mean a few things: the Islamists are losing ground, having to strike out at a lesser publicly (Western) known sect of Islam or, alternatively, the Islamists are showing their supporters that they're committed to their version of Islam by rooting out apostasy in their midst. I'd argue that it's the latter, Islamists distinguishing themselves by striking out at any "unbelievers" is a reaffirmation of their ultimate goals for structure: a new Caliphate under their version of Shairi'a. Further, adding Sufis to their hit list (since they're still killing Shi'a ulema when they can get their hands on them, in Iraq) is a way to get the governments in question to protect this group and therefor implicate themselves in heresy, bringing more cause to overthrowing those in power.

They're not slapping randomly, they're building a case by attempting to back established governments into a corner where they can further denounce their legitimacy and the legitimacy of those that support the governments.
0 Comments