Welcome to blog.chinoy.com Sign in | Join

Friday, April 15, 2005 - Posts

Afghanistan's requesting a long-term US military presence in the country. This is obviously what the leftists and Europeans have been fearing since the beginning of the whole Star Wars saga in 1977 -- the enevitable construction of the Death Star. How horrible for them.

For the rest of us here in reality, though, this is the start of the end of the "projection" of US military power - the US won't need to project: we're there.

With human rights organizations now decrying the genocide in Rwanda as a failure of the UN, saying that it could've been prevented with a police force equivalent to the Brooklyn P.D., a minimum has basically been established: that level of police presence is sufficient to prevent atrocities. It follows that an equivalent level of military projection should be able to do more than just hold down peace, but actually make progress. The US has about 18,000 troops in Afghanistan now. The US has about 3,000 in Qatar, 10,000 in Kuwait, 4,200 in Bahrain, and a few thousand each in Saudi Arabia and Oman. (2002 numbers)

I'm sure neither Pakistan, Russia, or Iran'll be happy about that request.
0 Comments
Europa - Constitution
Three guesses as to who said that. Me, good guess, but wrong. Jack? Also good guess, but still wrong. Yes, that's right, Jacques Chirac. Yesterday, the Head Cheese went on tv with a townhall style meeting in order to try to convince the country that they should vote "Oui!" in the upcoming May 29th referrendum for France's acceptance of the European Constitution. Seems like his future threats are more of a slow-to-the-party realization of France's actual status in the world. In the "Non!" camp are about 53%-55% of polled voters in France and Chirac's own party, the "Union for a Popular Majority." Sad times for one of the founders of the EU.

Greece's parliment is voting on Tuesday (04/19/2005) to see if it'll join the four other countries that have approved the EU Constitution (Lithuania, Hungary, Slovenia and Italy) [according to CNN.com... I thought Spain had also ratified it? Maybe that was just the "Si!" referrendum which needs to be formally approved by their socialist government. I'll check into that.]

The Economist has a rather pithy analysis (Can the constitution be saved?, 04/15/2005) of what'd happen if France says no on the 29th which highlights the utter bureaucratic morass that can happen when things are decided by committee. In a way, it's the height of Democracy, stagnation of decision at a governmental level that allows for the third and fourth tiers of society to function.
0 Comments